<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheist Catchphrases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wegoats.com/atheist-catchphrases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wegoats.com/atheist-catchphrases/</link>
	<description>For those of us who refuse to be sheep.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Atheist</title>
		<link>http://wegoats.com/atheist-catchphrases/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Atheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wegoats.com/?p=102#comment-15</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@GreenOdonata — Funny, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” works quite well for evolution defenders when a creationist asks for &quot;missing links&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@theadvidual — Thanks for pointing that out and for the kind words.  I hadn&#039;t thought about the id in relation to IDiot. I understood it was only meant to stand for Intelligent Design.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@GreenOdonata — Funny, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” works quite well for evolution defenders when a creationist asks for &#8220;missing links&#8221;.</p>

<p>@theadvidual — Thanks for pointing that out and for the kind words.  I hadn&#8217;t thought about the id in relation to IDiot. I understood it was only meant to stand for Intelligent Design.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theadividual</title>
		<link>http://wegoats.com/atheist-catchphrases/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>theadividual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wegoats.com/?p=102#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s interesting to note that you correctly put the emphasis on &quot;ID&quot; in the word &quot;IDiot.  The original Greek meaning was &quot;private person,&quot; and then Freud gave ID new meaning when he came up with Das Ich, the ID/ego. So to use the term as Nietzsche did when he said, &quot;Jesus was an idiot&quot; caused furor although it was meant literally: Jesus was of the ego, of the senses. It&#039;s the perfect term to use when referencing theists. Atheists who are critical thinkers, question any kind of idiotic activity. Great post.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note that you correctly put the emphasis on &#8220;ID&#8221; in the word &#8220;IDiot.  The original Greek meaning was &#8220;private person,&#8221; and then Freud gave ID new meaning when he came up with Das Ich, the ID/ego. So to use the term as Nietzsche did when he said, &#8220;Jesus was an idiot&#8221; caused furor although it was meant literally: Jesus was of the ego, of the senses. It&#8217;s the perfect term to use when referencing theists. Atheists who are critical thinkers, question any kind of idiotic activity. Great post.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenOdonata</title>
		<link>http://wegoats.com/atheist-catchphrases/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenOdonata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wegoats.com/?p=102#comment-13</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In response to the so-often used theist catchphrase &quot;Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!&quot; my usual response is &quot;Absence of evidence is not evidence for existence.&quot; Just figured I&#039;d throw that out there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the so-often used theist catchphrase &#8220;Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!&#8221; my usual response is &#8220;Absence of evidence is not evidence for existence.&#8221; Just figured I&#8217;d throw that out there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

